DA
C
460
14 I not mention the visit to lacan?
10.
PUC/21/22
entioned that it was agreed that they went to flacau.
D
2. 151:
Jos.
E
F
B
K
L
M
Q
R
S
T
C
50 4
Yes, but I had intended to say. what I had said ves, In Lo vicw the visit to Haceu was a cover-up.” Ies.
It any rate, your Honour, insofar as the conspiracy was culcerned, your Honour has found that the 2nd accused was prezent at this meeting, and that resuted, amongst other things, to Iltre ng-sang being arrested. There has certainly been no clear-cut evidence before your Honour that the 2nd accused had anything at all to do with the other people being released. It is true that roum Honour has found that as a detective sergeant he did not puste investigations into this particular case further than he should have as a police officer, but he was certainly not instrumentel by inself in the other people who had been arrested being released.
CORE:
Te are only concerned with the conspiracy which is basically tio agreement, the intention to carry out. The fact that the Crow called the evidence which supported - which shoved that the agree- ment in fact was carried out does not make the position any different.
2. 19: I am much obliged, your Honour. As regards the perju
clarjes, your Honour, your honour has found that the 2nd accused gate these false statements Imoving that they were false whom they appeared before ir. Justice YANG. But if it is truc, your Eozom, that when he appeared before Mr. Justice YANG, Ir. Justice I was conducting a Commission of Aquiry, it wasn't as if anybody
trial for any offer.ce, so that one could say that by giving, this perjury evidence the 2nd accused was not putting anybody in jeopardy. In any event, your Honour, ir. Justice YANG was not
cled by the perjured evidence that the 1st and 2nd accused gave because Ir. Justice YANG found as a fact the meeting did take place
vas C:
Well, I haven't read the report at all, I don't know what ib. Justice TANG found.
E
F
G
H
K
L
M
N
P
I think at this stage it would be proper for me to advise Your Bonour of what Ir. Justice YANG found.
Q
A: I haven't read the report, either the report itself or if it
was published in the papers I certainly haven't read it. 1 probably was away, I think, during that stage, I am not sure. ICOMBAT: But I mentioned that because it niht have a mitigating
effect on the two perjury changes because it wasn't as ii Mr. Justico VMC was isled by the perjured ovidence, he was not risled. He found that the meeting did take place and that $10,000 12s paid over to LUNG Wing-sang. But in the event he found that amongst obler reasons, one of which was that LEUNG Wing-sang had been identified by other people, that LEUNG Wing-sang's conviction
R
S
U
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.