TNAG-0679-FCO40-828-Allegations-of-corruption-and-bribery-in-Hong-Kong-1978 — Page 103

1

P.0.Box 1296

Church Street Station New York, N.Y. 10007

The Honorable Lord Chancellor Appellate Committees

Hoe of Lord,

British Parliament, London, England.

Dear Sirs:

October 28th, 1977

SHANCELLO?

CECEIVED

- 4 NOV 1977

VATE OFT

Re: Tyranny of Corruption of Hongkong Magistrate

羅顯

(1) No Money, No Trial

(2) No Money, No Right To Put Up A Defence.

(3) No Money, Illegal Judgment Without Trial.

(4) No Money, Illegal Judgment Without Allowing An

Innocent Defendant To Put Up a Defence.

(5) Magistrate Lo Hing-shing Corruptly Using Intimidation Coercion, Duress, Threat, Extortion, Blackmail, Haras sment, and Terrorism To Make The Open Court As The Be autiful Instrument To Make Money.'

I therefore should be most grateful if you could forward

my humble request to

Thank you very much for the sake of justice.

Yours Sincerely

P.S. I am not I.R.A., neither am I P.L..O.. nor I am Japanese Red

Army. I am a law-abiding people. I cannot hijack an airplane, nor can I throw a bomb to kill innocent people. My only weapon is to tell the truth to the world how have been treated by a corrupt Hongkong Magistrate

(羅鮪勝) in such

an outrgeous riot measured by any standard of à civilized so- ciety. This is my only resort and also my last recourse I can do to vindicate my reputation which has been savagely smeared by a corrupt Magistrate in Hongkong. This is not a trial. This is a riot where the magistrate

his broker (at the same time, a perjury prosecution witness) sided with to participate in the quarrel by declaring an illegal judgment on revenge against the innocent defendant in order to cover up a disgraceful scandel in which Magistrate Lo Hing-shing is the chief culprit.