9
paid-up membership.
The full report of the Registrar for 1975 was not
available at the time of our enquiries, but from his detailed record we
found only 19 unions with more than 4000 claimed members and only 6 with
10,000 or more. In his 1974 report, 160 unions, more than half of those
registered, claimed a membership of 250 or less.
**
18. In type, moreover, unions remain generally restricted in their
jurisdictional coverage. A few of the larger unions, notably such
bigger associates of the FTU as the seamen's, motor transport, and
textile unions, are in principle of an 'industrial' type. But there are
many smaller associations confined to particular occupational or local
groups and minor trades within larger economic sectors. This fragmenta-
tion has clearly been encouraged in the past by the law relating to union
registration, but one doubts that to be the only factor. Despite a more
liberal attitude in this respect on the administration's part, there has
been only one successful combination of unions in a closer grouping
and that of 4 very small printers' societies with a combined membership
below 200. There is still despite the alleged mobility of much of the
Hong Kong labour force no union of a "general" type. By and large,
the biggest unions are associated with the FTU, and the smallest are
found in the "neutral group". Indeed, it is clear that much of the
recent growth in the number of unions has occurred in the public service,
where a more tolerant attitude towards union membership and activity has
apparently helped to promote a proliferation of small organisations.
Three-quarters of the 40 or so new employee organisations registered in
the four years to end-1975 were in the public service proper, and
several of the rest were in semi-public occupations such as teaching
and hospitals. The multiplication of civil service organisations appears
to be accelerating: for the year 1975/76 the annual Report on the Civil
Service recorded that their number rose from 66 to 86.
19. It has been said to us on several occasions that less than 5% of
the employed labour force of Hong Kong is covered by collective
agreements. I know of no systematic basis on which this figure could be
calculated if only because the term "collective agreement" is itself
open to wide interpretation. But if taken to mean that wages, pay
structures and conditions or terms of employment are negotiated in
detail between firms or employer organisations and trade union represen-
tatives, and embodied in signed agreements which are regularly revised,
I should think the figure, if anything, an exaggeration. It is true
/that
Page 90Page 91
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.