TNAG-0616-FCO40-764-Policy-of-UK-on-status-of-Hong-Kong-1977 — Page 203

CONFILENIL

hr Bowie - LN Dept.

UN CORE BRANGD ON

LAST

PEF.

NEXT

REF.

DOOR, ZION OF

Enter & by in so wh

Adunen

Legul acerminating

IN inna LÁ CE

12

1 om little concerned at the burden of para. 2 of your Minuts of 7ruary on this conference. I am unclear w tuer, in legel terminology, there is a difference between

end u succcecion of governments

succensiun But if tr

of states at met, mad if it is the th latention to orgue

alveg sould be banned Ly treaties concluded orc, bien such an argument has implications

1 tlons over kong kung•

that succeir

by their

for

2. 31st

1..

1 1

attached belof IS

scully it

UN General

}

red for the

temer gives

' clades tu

Lunist Lin sc de not hold mong hole

t

jubi

valid, necLUSE vi intermil

action

to mong

I

CA 14

Ġ DA Cin

Can be

LU DE

bid.

dona int☺

present, inbratiji.

to which

t.

condition

first bucket, tumb

Gnowledge but

iù be

would wish

midig on bue

Le unfo.tenste for mong nong if

tuut . lest OL LI New

aon do we be any

Patisting negotiations on Hong

Gorrity

of long • the co

tair

referred.

J

of the NEW

Pronat letters on the status Telow to your legal,dvisers,

ici to which I have already

28 February 1977

I J VI.

nung hong dept.

Copy to Mr Orr, SED (for information, without attachments)