TNAG-0614-FCO40-762-Visit-by-delegation-from-Heung-Yee-Kuk-(Rural-Consultive-Cou-1977 — Page 18

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

4.

increasingly urbanized, making the land unsuitable for

agricultural purposes. Apart from environmental pollution,

there are considerations such as the diversion of traditional

water supplies rendering agriculture difficult.

(ii) The freezing" of development potential and the delay in the

processing of applications for development have a particularly

detrimental effect as the 99 year term of the New Territories

Lease draws to a close.

The inhabitants of the New Territories have long expressed their

dissatisfaction with the compensation paid by the Crown on the resumption or

compulsory acquisition of their land. The proof of the inadequacy is that in

nearly all cases, where the owner and particularly a small landowner, does not

wish to become dispossessed and abandon farming as a way of life he finds that he

cannot buy comparable land at a price which is anything like the compensation rate.

5.

In an attempt to assuage this dissatisfaction, Government introduced

a system of "Land Exchange Entitlement" applicable where land which is situated

in a planned lay-out scheme is resumed. For every 5 square feet of agricultural

land an entitlement to 2 sq. ft. of building land is granted, and where building

land is resumed the land exchange entitlement is on a foot for foot basis. However

a substantial premium has to be paid, being the difference between the value of

the building land granted as valued by Government and the value of the land

resumed or surrendered prior to resumption. In 1976 the value of the land granted

in exchange (on a 2 for 5 basis) was set at about $350.00 per square foot, and the

owner of agricultural land was credited with $10.00 per square foot, so the owner

of say 5,000 square feet of agricultural land would have a credit of $50,000.00

(5,000 x $10.00) to set against #700,000.00 (2,000 x $350.00), i.e. the expropriated

owner would have to pay $650,000.00. In the case of resumed building land, say of

2,000 square feet, this would be valued on the basis of "restricted village building

land" at about $50.00 per square foot, and the owner would have to pay a premium of

about $300.00 per sq. ft. i.e., about $600,000.00 for an area of 2,000 square feet.

The above substantial premiums have to be paid by owners who have had to give up

<

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.