5
these the quotas would be cut back below the 1976 level of trade. It is
RA
of course almost unprecedented to demand a roll-back of quota at all,
and this discrimination against Hong Kong and the other principal suppliers
for the 8 items would be as damaging as the precedent is dangerous.
Seven of these items affect Hong Kong and account for 57% of our textile
exports to the EEC. While the effect of the Community's ideas might not
reduce our present level of textile trade with the EEC in these items,
which is depressed, they would block the possibility of recovery of our
exports once business in the EEC picks up again. In other words the
practical effect for these items would be to nail us down to somewhere near
the present depressed level of trade. The loss of trade below the 1976
level envisaged by the Commission would be about $480 M., but the loss
in trade possibilities in the EEC could be over $1,000 M.
15.
While I understand the pressures generated by a high level of
imports, by unemployment and politics, under which the EEC Lave evolved
these ideas, their application to Hong Kong is as lacking in equity as in
logical statistical basis. Hong Kong has not been the culprit, if that is
the right word, in surge of imports into Europe in the last two years; this
has come from other countries. Indeed, imports from Hong Kong of these items
since 1975 have significantly declined. While one might understand the
EEC's wish to give their own industry a respite through stabilising
imports, their proposal to create a pool of quota for so-called 'newcomers'
and countries with preferential arrangements, and to do so at the
expense of Hong Kong and a few other established suppliers, is grossly
discriminatory, whether it applies to one principal supplier or to three:
it would mean that the EEC was assisting other countries not at its own
expense, but at ours. It is particularly unreasonable to make a special
target of Hong Kong, which not only is more dependent on textile exports
than any other community, but has an excellent record of agreeing to and
/administering..
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.