TNAG-0597-FCO40-744-Future-of-Dependent-Territories-territorial-studies-1977 — Page 96

$

2

4.

All these complications notwithstanding, we are bound both

for policital as well as economic reasons to go ahead with plans to

grant independence in to any Territory that is ready for it and where

We cannot force

1

the majority of the people desire independence.

independence on any Territory would attempt to overcome reluctance

and hesitation. We must be seen to be working towards the goal of

independence for our remaining colonies as we are bound by the UN

Charter not to withhold independence. We have to preserve both our

ikis international image as a liberal colonial power and

our credibility in the Commonwealth, already a little tarnished by

the Rhodesian affair. We have also to satisfy Barliament with that

we are in fact carrying out our responsibilities in this

respect.

From

the point of view of internal politics in the DTs themselves, it

may be argued particularly since the recent coup in the Seychelles,

that some Territories have situations which need careful handling.

This is true up to a point, but it can also be said that it is wiser

for us to leave these countries to work out their own solutions as

we cannot, in the long run, control their destinies and it is better

to avoid further involvement.

5.

For economic reasons the present process of decolonisation

would seem to be the best course. Administrative responsibility and

defence involve considerable expenditure of staffing and funds. These

would be a continuing burden on the UK as well as the Territories

remaining dependent. The granting of independence involves expenditure

but this is usually a once-for-all matter and direct financial

responsibility by the UK should cease upon independence. There will

also be a corresponding reduction in the staffing of the FCO once the

Dependent Territories have gone. A reduction of staff in the FCO in

the present economic climate should have attractions.

16.