CONFIDENTIAL
2
in each case would be the UNHCR's assurance of
responsibility for final asylum and that this mattered
more than the acceptance of costs, welcome though the
latter was. H.E.'s personal view was that Hong Kong could accept future groups of refugees provided that numbers were not too great, that they did not come too often and
that firm assurances were given in each case.
4.
Mr. Sampatkumar saw no possibility of the
flow of refugees from Vietnam ceasing altogether, but
the numbers this year were somewhat less than last year.
There were still many who wished to leave because they
had relatives who had already left the country or because
they had had associations with the former regime, with
Government agencies or the Americans (a knowledge of English
was regarded as sufficient evidence of this).
5.
-
Mr. Sampat kumar saw no need for a permanent
UNHCR representative in Hong Kong the numbers of refugees
involved were too small and the voluntary agencies were
coping. H.E. assured him that no-one had suggested that
this would be necessary but added that it would be very helpful if a representative could come to Hong Kong in the event of any new development. Mr. Sampat kumar agreed
that this would be done.
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.