CONFIDENTIAL:
COVERING SECRET
units in Hong Kong for mainly internal security purposes seems to me to be doubtful. I suppose, though the forces are mainly Ghurka, there is nevertheless a UK "back-up" element which limits our
If so, flexibility and weakens our commitment to NATO. this is a liability attributable to our responsibility
for Hong Kong.
(v) I note that you have made some comparisons with
Singapore. Would it be worthwhile trying to make these more specific and perhaps extend them? Perhaps, however, to do so would make the paper unduly long.
Anney
(vi)
3.
It seems to me that the risks and the consequences of financial collapse are still over-stated and that the paper still insufficiently indicates the total dependence of Hong Kong on HMG.
As I shall not be in the office to-morrow, I am sending these comments to you through Mr Cortazzi. If there is time, we might be able to discuss before the PUS returns.
4 March 1976
cc: PS/PUS
Erlan
E N Larmour
Discussed with M. O'Keefe to whom
Mr
I have
дийл
my
comments
orally
4/
CONFIDENTIAL
COVERING SECRET
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.