TNAG-0544-FCO40-639-Strength-of-garrison-in-Hong-Kong-1975 — Page 138

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

SECRET UK EYES A

(a) Could we not have achieved 75% from the outset?

(b) Should we have "given away" such valuable real estate?

(c) Should we have made public at this stage details of

the revised garrison?

(a) Has not the decision to keep the agreement "Secret"

left us in a vulnerable position?

I attach defensive notes on these points.

3 November 1975

R.J. ANDREW

AUS(GS)

SECRET

-2-

UK EYES A

}

f

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.