CONFIDENT I AL
CONFIDENTIAL
Region is already a cause for serious concern as a result of the
weakening of indigenous forces, the instability of the area, and
its exposed position vis-à-vis Soviet penetration and the possible
repercussions of conflicts in neighbouring theatres. The aband on-
ment of British force commitments to NATO in the Mediterranean
would (apart from their military implications) leave the United
States as the only non-Mediterranean country to maintain a
permanent presence there.
There is the danger that these moves
would be regarded by the Soviet Union, and perhaps by some sectors
of our own public opinion as well, as a weakening of NATO's resolve
and purpose in defending the Southern Region; this cannot but
affect the solidarity of the Alliance, on which its security so
largely depends. The scale of politico-military damage which
could result from such withdrawals seems scarcely commensurate
with the savings expected.
7. Grave considerations of a similar nature which are spelled
out in detail in the military assessments apply in the Northern
Region, where the security of NATO territory has traditionally
depended heavily on the deterrent effect of external reinforcement,
to which the "nited Kingdom is now proposing to make a significant
reduction. This also applies to the Maritime Commands.
8. The Defence Planning Committee is glad to note that no
significant reductions are envisaged in the Central Region in
advance of an MBFR agreement, and that certain increases in the
air support available for this area are planned; they hope, however,
to receive more information in due course on the reorganisation
B 3
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.