CONFIDENTIAL
2ND DRAFT
reduce its conventional ground forces manpower to the same number
and that such reductions should take into
a "common ceiling"
account current disparities in combat capability. NATO has suggested
that the first phase of reduction leading towards this ultimate aim
of approximate parity of ground forces should be made by the United
States and the Soviet Union, both of whom occupy a special place
in their respective Alliances, and whose military resources are far
greater than those of the other participants.
28. The Warsaw Pact for its part has proposed equal percentage
reductions in all the forces of both sides. This would perpetuate
the current imbalance of forces in the Warsaw Pact's favour. but at
lower levels. Such a basis for force reductions would do nothing
to correct the imbalance which the West believes to be a serious
potential threat to political stability in Europe; nor would it be
compatible with the principle that the outcome of MBFR should assure
undiminished security for both East and West at a lower level of
forces. On the basis proposed by the Warsaw Pact, the smaller NATO
forces could be reduced to a level at which they could no longer
effectively defend the existing (and irreducible) length of front
against the still superior Warsaw Pact forces facing them; in which
event their deterrent value, and hence the security of the West,
would be seriously impaired.
29. The West's preparations for the negotiations have been
meticulous and its objectives and strategy have been clearly defined.
as befits negotiations of such crucial importance for the security
of the Alliance. The unity of the Alliance's negotiators is a
powerful tribute to the flexibility of the NATO consultative
--
11 CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.