TNAG-0510-FCO40-575-Registration-of-merchant-shipping-in-Hong-Kong-1974 — Page 65

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

2

Cowley said these points would be covered in the team's report.

2

On the question of equipment, Dr. Cowley said one of

the problems was that Japanese shipyards were accustomed to

building ships on a package-deal basis. It would be for shipowners

to decide whether they were prepared to make the necessary

alterations if required. H.E. the Governor thought there would

not be much difficulty with new ships. The problem was largely

over conversions of old ships, and he wondered whether the D.T.I.

team could give him an impression of the size of this problem.

Captain Anderson said the team's impression was that shipowners

were concentrating on the future and were not intending to put

many existing ships on the Register. In reply to a further

question from H.E. the Governor, Dr. Cowley said practice in the

U.K. was that a two-year grace period would be allowed for

conversions.

3

Mr. Fletcher pointed out that shipowners were basically

worried about costs. Much depended on the extent to which

equipment of Japanese manufacture would be accepted. A list of

approved equipment manufacturers would be needed before Hong Kong

shipowners could assess the cost implications of applying D.T.I.

standards.

4

H.E. the Governor asked whether sufficient information

had been obtained on the acceptability of Japanese equipment to

enable Hong Kong shipowners to make a judgement as to the tonnage

they might be prepared to commit to a Hong Kong Register. Mr.

Thompson said the team would report their findings to their

superiors. They could not, as a team, decide on whether a

particular manufacturer or piece of equipment was acceptable.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.