TNAG-0499-FCO40-564-Administration-of-justice-in-Hong-Kong-1974 — Page 88

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Flag

CONFIDENTIAL

4.

comments.

In January this year we received Hong Kong's long delayed

These suggested that there was no need for fundamental

changes, other than the creation of a separate Court of Appeal.

5.

The

Some of JUSTICE's complaints do seem to have been adopted

rather uncritically from Barristers in Hong Kong, one of whose main

concerns is to enhance the status of their own profession.

Governor's reply provides a complete answer in some respects.

Nevertheless, while there does not appear to be any serious ground for

criticism, there are certain aspects of the matter in which we think

there is scope for improvement. Sir Duncan Watson, the Department's

legal adviser and I have recently discussed the whole question with

Hong Kong's Attorney-General, Mr Hobley, who is in the UK on leave.

Mr Hobley agreed that there were a number of useful measures that

should be further considered.

6.

We are writing to the Governor about these measures and

will submit to the Minister in the light of his reply. But Lord

Gardiner may well wonder what is happening about his representations.

Lord Goronwy-Roberts may therefore wish to let Lord Gardiner know that

he is aware of his interest and will be getting in touch with him again.

I accordingly recommend that Lord Goronwy-Roberts should write to

Lord Gardiner on the lines of the attached draft.

7.

The Department's legal adviser agrees.

25 April 1974

CC

Sir D Watson o.r. Mr Rushford

CONFIDENTIAL

A C Stuart

Hong Kong & Indian Ocean Dept.

Sir D. Walion

Julyül

A

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.