CONFIDENTIAL
|| #
WE SUGGEST THAT THE FILE SHOULD BE URGENTLY EXAMINED SEE IF IT CONTAINS ANY DOCUMENT THAT WOULD ENDANGER NATIONAL SECURITY ETC., AND THAT NO CLAIM FOR CROWN PRIVILEGE SHOULD BE MADE EXCEPT IN RELATION TO SUCH A DOCUMENT IF IT EXISTS.
5μ
WHATEVER YOUR CONCLUSION, COUNSEL WILL NEED THE FILE WELL BEFORE THE RESUMCD HEARING, AND IT SHOULD BE RETURNED TO LONDON WITH THE MINIMUM OF DELAY.
6. IN VIEW OF THE ALLEGATION THAT A DOCUMENT HAS BEEN
MI SAPPROPRIATED, IT IS HIGHLY DESIRABLE THAT COUNSEL SHOULD IF POSSIBLE BE IN A POSITION TO TENDER THE WHOLE FILE TO THE COURT, AND BE GIVEN TIME TO STUDY IT BEFORE THE HEARING SO THAT HE MAY PREPARE HIMSELF TO DEAL WITH QUESTIONS OF RELEVANCE AND POSSIBLY CONSULT ABOUT THE FILE WITH DEFENCE COUNSEL.
S
7. (YOUR TELNO 1611) DOCUMENTS WERE DULY PASSED TO GODBER'S SOLICITORS ON 14 OCTOBER.
CALLAGHAN
FILES
RKIOD
NID
NEWS D
LEGAL ADVISERS MR SCOTT
2
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 30Page 31
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.