Copies of my letters dd. 7th Aug. and 16th Dec. 1973 respectively addressed to the Commissioner of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force, duly signed.
(b) Copies of my letters dd. 8th Sept. 6th Oct. and 14th Dec. 1973 respectively,
y signed, addressed to the Director of Anti-Corruption, Royal Hong Kong ice Force.
(c) Copy of my letter dd. 26th Oct. 1973, duly signed, addressed to the Adminis-
trative Secretary to the Office of Unofficial Members of Executive and Legislative Councils of Hong Kong.
(d) Copies of letters to me from the Director of Anti-Corruption, Royal Hong Kong Police Force, dated 17th Aug., 1st Oct. and 26th Oct. 1973 respectively.
On 14th Dec. and 16th Dec. 1973 respectively, I wrote two letters sent by registered post to the Commissioner of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force and their Director of Anti-Corruption, appealing to them to clean up the mess with their subordinates and take remedial action before 1st January, 1974.
At the end of my letter dd. 16th Dec. 1973 to the Commissioner of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force, it was expressly stated that "Should there be no remedial action and/or response to this letter before 1st January 1974, it will be assumed that the police have not had any regret about the events that have befallen upon me, that they are in complete agreement with the contents of my reports and accompanying papers, that they connive at the existence of 'Lo Chin Kuk' or 'Tin Sin Kuk' swindle rackets and the protection ring behind them, as well as the malpractices/irregularities that have been perpetrated in connexion with the so-called "investigations".(Please refer to enclosed copy of the said letter.)
Up to the time of writing of this letter, there have been no reply whatsoever from the Commissioner of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force or their Director of Anti-Cor- ruption to my letters as aforesaid or indications of any remedial actions taken by the police.
Apart from lack of courtesy, the silence and failure to take remedial action within the specified time accordingly show that the Royal Hong Kong Police and their Com- missioner are in complete agreement with the contents of my reports and accompanying papers that they connive at the existence of 'Lo Chin Kuk' or 'Tin Sin Kuk' swindle rackets in the Colony of Hong Kong, and the protection ring behind them, as well as the malpractices/irregularities that have been perpetrated in connexion with police "investigations", fully described in the foregoing passages and enclosures.
On 19th Dec. and 20th Dec. 1973 respectively, I also wrote by registered mail to Chief Inspector W. Duncanson, of the Kowloon Anti-Corruption Office,calling upon him and his colleagues to meet me at 10.00A.M. on 22nd Dec. 1973 at the entrance of the Colonial Secretariat, Central Government Offices, Hong Kong, so that we could go to see the Secretary for Security in order that the "anti-corruption officers of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force might undergo tests for their credibility and prove that they have been conducting investigations into my complaints about syndicated crimes and collectiv corruption in accordance with orders from the Crown and the Hong Kong Government.
However, Chief Inspector W. Duncanson and his colleagues failed to turn up at the appointed place and time.
As a victim and a private citizen, I, with due respect and sincerity, beseech YOU HONOURABLE MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCILS OF HONG KONG to ask the Royal Hong Kong Police and their Commissioner to show all peoples under the British flag that they are carrying out their duties as Crown servants and policies of the Hong Kong Government; that they are prepared to uphold the rule of law and discipline of their members; that they are not corrupt and connected with the protection rings behind vice rackets and illegal places in the Colony of Hong Kong; thay they do not connive at the existence of crimes, protection racketeering, corruption, as well as the abovementioned malpractices/irregularities; that they are entitled to and should enjoy the previlege and prestige resulting from continued use of the word 'Royal'. Furthermore, Honourable Members of the Councils of Hong Kong are cordially requested to take up my cases with the authorities concerned, including the Executivexand the
Council Secretary for Security, to see why the Royal Hong Kong Police have not been investi- gating syndicated crimes and collective corruption on my complaints and orders from the Hong Kong Government, why they have failed to reply to my letters or take remedial actions after irregularities/malpractices were brought to their notice. Thanking you for your kind attention.
Enclosures.
(3)
Yours faithfully
Pun Ting Chau
Victim
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.