TNAG-0489-FCO40-554-Allegations-of-bribery-and-corruption-in-Hong-Kong-police-an-1974 — Page 21

Mrs. Elliott,

May this case of mine be treated a criminal one? I have had

sufficient evidences to prove that the accused, Madam KWOK CHUNG HO, making false statement, so as to mislead the Court. Her statement misled the Judge's verdict. The judge had no reason at all to believe, and he had no evidences to support, that there was a business transaction between KWOK CHUNG HO and me; and that KWOK gave me money and I in turn gave it to YEUNG KIT, the shohkeeper. I do not know if the mis-judge of my case was deal to the Resettlement Department or the Supreme Court. I often learned over the radio that a prisoner who had been sentenced to death often had lenient sentence after petition to the governor. I do not know if my case would be treated likewise if I petition to the governor. KWOK had no evidence

If she is not to support her saying that she had been living in the shop. the wife of brother, then there should have nothing like this kind happened.

If she is a stranger to me then I will ask YEUNG KIT to hand the shop, empty, over to me. In fact, shortly after I had the transaction done with YEUNG KIT, I moved in. Few months later, KWOK came and destroyed

I wish you would help me again. my goods and drove me away.

WONG CHUEN SANG,

7th August, 1971.