TNAG-0489-FCO40-554-Allegations-of-bribery-and-corruption-in-Hong-Kong-police-an-1974 — Page 148

RESTRICTED

5. MRS ELLIOTT SAYS THAT THE REPLY FROM THE COLONIAL SECRETARY IS NOT SATISFACTORY BECAUSE THE ALLEGATIONS THAT (1) LEE ASKED FOR A BRIBE (11) THAT MONEY WAS STOLEN, HAVE NOT BEEN PROPERLY INVESTIGATED. ALSO NO EXPLANATION HAS BEEN GIVEN AS TO WHY THE HUT WAS DEMOLISHED DURING THE ABSENCE OF BOTH PARENTS AND WHY, IF THE HUT WAS DEMOLISHED BECAUSE IT WAS SLIGHTLY TOO LARGE (AS STATED IN MR MORTIMER'S LETTER), WHY MR LUI WAS NOT INFORMED BEFOREHAND.

ć.

A COPY OF MRS ELLIOTT'S LETTER FOLLOWS BY BAG. GRATEFUL FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS CASE AS SOON AS

POSSIBLE.

DOUGLAS-HOME

Files

HKIDD.

MA

PS/MR BLAKER,

2.-

RESTRICTED