Registry No.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
Top Secret.
Secret.
Confidential,
•
SECRET
DRAFT LETTER
To:-
Type +
FROM
HF T Smith Esq CMG Cabinet Office Whitehall
J A Thomson
Telephone No. Ext.
1
Restricted.
Unclassified.
PRIVACY MARKING
CC
In Confidence
PJ Hudson Esq
AUS
Defence Staff MOD
N G F Hall Esq Under-Secretary HM Treasury
DEFENCE REVIEW: HONG KONG
1.
Department
We agreed at the Sub-Committee meeting on
2 October that there was no absolute need to have formal consultations with Hong Kong's Executive Council until May 1975. This postponement will enable the Governor to get the 1975-76 Hong Kong Budget out of the way, including higher taxation to pay for the social programme which is strongly supported by UK Ministers. ; We also all agreed that neither an early Parliamentary statement nor the subsequent White Paper need give any figures for Hong Kong.
2. It is equally important that any statement should in no way imply that a decision on Hong Kong has already been taken, in advance of consultations. Any such implication would be almost as damaging in Hong Kong as publication of the details of that
decision.
and I am
3. I have been wondering how the passage on Hong Kong might be phrased so as to meet the needs of both the British and Hong Kong Governments; writing now to say that I propose to ask, at tomorrow's meeting, whether the Sub-Committee could agree to something on the following lines:
"The current defence agreement with Hong Kong runs until March 1976. Before that date there will have to be consultations with the Hong Kong Government about a successor agreement. Our commitment to defend Hong Kong will remain. The purpose of the consultations will be to agree on how the cost of the necessary forces should be divided. Under the present agreement Hong Kong contribute about £81 m. a year. But in our
·mont
6195 D073528 400M 2/74 Cr.P.C. 839/3
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
..
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.