RESTRICTED
4.
THE CHAIRMAN ATTEMPTED TO DEFER DISCUSSION. ON
PRODUCTS.
CONDITAL
SOME DELEGATIONS COULD NOT TAKE UP ANY POSITION UNTIL
WE
THE ACP NEGOTIATIONS HAD REACHED A MORE ADVANCED STAGE.
THEREFORE NO NEED TO DISCUSS THESE PROPOSALS NOW. WE DEMURRED.
ACCEPTED THAT THERE WERE PROBLEMS RELATING TO THE TIMING OF THE CONCESSIONS WHICH WOULD BE BETTER DISCUSSED AT THE POLITICAL LEVEL
BUT THE GROUP SHOULD ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE THE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS
FOR OUR PART WE WERE OPPOSED TO SPECIFIC DUTIES BOTH BECAUSE OF.
THEIR GREATER COMPLICATION AND BECAUSE FLUCTUATIONS IN PRICES
COULD RESULT IN TOTAL ELIMINATION OF THE PREFERENCE. THE DUTCH
SAID THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS FOR SPECIFIC DUTIES WERE TOTALLY.
UNACCEPTABLE. CONCESSIONS SHOULD COME INTO FORCE ON 1 JANUARY 1975.
THEY WERE NOT SEEKING THE WITHDRAWAL OF ANY CONCESSIONS ALREADY
MADE ON COCONUT OIL. THE FRENCH SAID THAT THEY MIGHT ACCEPT A
''GESTURE'' IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ACP NEGOTIATIONS BUT THEY WOULD NOT
BE ABLE TO AGREE TO ANY DECISION UNTIL THE ACP NEGOTIATIONS WERE
SUBSTANTIALLY CONCLUDED. THIS COULD BE BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR.
THE DANES, GERMANS AND IRISH WERE IN FAVOUR OF THE COMMISSION'S
PROPOSALS. THE BELGIANS SUPPORTED THE FRENCH.
5. ON THE TOBACCO QUOTA FOR 1975 WE REPEATED OUR DEMAND FOR A
QUOTA SHARE OF 28,000 TONS FOR THE UK. THE DANES WANTED 2, 3300 TONS, THE ITALIANS 2,000 TONS AND THE IRISH 1,700 TONS. THE DUTCH
AND GERMANS ALSO WANTED INCREASES IN THEIR QUOTA SHARES. THE
BELGIANS AND FRENCH ACCEPTED THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSAL BUT WERE
OPPOSED TO GOING BEYOND 22,000 TONS MAINLY BECAUSE OF THE GREEK INTEREST. THE ITALIANS, DESPITE THEIR REQUEST FOR A BIGGER QUOTA,
COULD NOT LIFT THEIR RESERVE ON THE PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUATION OF
A TARIFF QUOTA FOR TOBACCO FOR ANOTHER YEAR. THERE WAS A LENGTHY
DISCUSSION ABOUT THE UTILISATION OF THE QUOTA. THE COMMISSION
POINTED OUT THAT ALTHOUGH THE QUOTA HAD BEEN SET UP FOR THE SAKE
OF COUNTRIES COVERED BY THE JOINT DECLARATION OF INTENT A LARGE PART OF THE COMMUNITY'S IMPORTS UNDER IT HAD BEEN FROM OTHER
COUNTRIES, PARTICULARLY BRAZIL. THEY URGED MEMBER STATES TO SEEK WAYS TO SEE THAT THOSE FOR WHOM IT WAS INTENDED BENEFITED. THE
CHAIRMAN PROPOSED A MINIMUM PRICE PROVISION BUT THE GENERAL OPINION
WAS THAT THIS WOULD NOT HAVE THE DESIRED EFFECT, THE GERMANS SAID
THEY SAW NO REASON WHY OTHER COUNTRIES THAN THE J D I SHOULD NOT
BENEFIT ALSO. THE DANES WERE ALSO OPPOSED TO ANY DISCRIMINATION. THE ITALIANS SAID THE 2,900 TON QUOTA THEY WERE SEEKING WOULD
BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDIA.
2 RESTRICTED
/INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS:
Page 75Page 76
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.