0
di stat puschi actís do i caus in
same paragraph the Committee observes that "It is of interest to note that a rumber of countries which previously relied only on the existence of general principles of law or on the strength of trade unions, have adopted in the last ten years legal provisions granting special protection against acts of interference". footnote mentions the UK, amongst others, as having done this.
A
The Report stresses that "whenever it appears that there is insufficient protection against interference ....................... governments having ratified the Convention are under the obligation to take specific action, in particular through legislative means, to ensure the guarantees provided for in the Convention".
Mr Valticos is clearly inclining to the view that unless the collective organisations are so strong as to prevent all acts of interference there should be legislative provision.
I notice you think there is some substance in the comments of Mr Valticos on the application of Article 1. You may be interested to know that in 1969 the Committee of Experts noted with satisfaction a new legislative decree in the Syrian Arab Republic by virtue of which workers were to enjoy adequate protection, inter alia, in respect of acts calculated to make the employment of a worker subject to the condition that he shall not join a union or shall relinquish trade union
membership.
2
من کاری
sincerely, thed Shapel-
FE SHARPLES
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.