in market prices. We do not accept this inter-
pr
tion because it fails to take into account
that the November formula explicitly extended only
to breaches that are purely accidental, not to
any breaches.
4.
There then arises the question of what
breaches can be regarded as purely accidental.
Although you have asked, by implication, for
greater precision, we think it would be impossible
to try to set out a comprehensive list of possible
purely accidental breaches. In fact, it would
•
-/33 Fag c
be hardly to the advantage of the participants
since unlisted breaches would presumably be ineligible.
5. But as indication of what we regard as the
only fair and reasonable approach, we have stated
(in para 2 of our Tel No 357 of 10 April) that
we regard a purely accidental breach as one
which could not reasonably have been foreseen or
prudently provided against (if you can think of a
more useful form of words to describe "accidental",
we should be very happy to consider it); and instances as
an example, a breach arising from a
substantial
fall in the price of gilts in the last say,
two or three days of the month by which we meant
of course "working days. This is in no sense a
restriction of the November formula since it would
plainly be a quite distortion of the language of
that formula to treat as purely accidental a
breach that could reasonably have been foreseen or
prudently provided against. This being so, we were
frankly very surprised to find that you had regarded
the November formula as entitling Hong Kong to
expect that HMG would accept as purely accidental a
mesab
ops that agyla birra annanpol
/breach
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.