TNAG-0425-FCO40-471-Construction-of-an-underground-railway-system-in-Hong-Kong-1973 — Page 62

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

that it hurt. Japanese interests it would be counter to

UK policy towards Japan. It would also, by implication,

transfer to HMG responsibility for the performance of

UK firms whom we had forced upon the Hong Kong Government.

Moreover, unless the contract in Hong Kong seems to have

been won on a commercial basis it will not provide the

reference point for future business which is one of the

main elements in the national interest case.

Technically it would be open to us to cover the Anglo-

Italian consortium against loss, eg by providing an

element of equity financing under Section 8 of the Industr

Act. We could not recommend such a course however. The

precedent it would creat would make us vulnerable to a

never-ending stream of requests for similar help to UA

firms facing major international competition.

It would,

moreover, be barely compatible with the UK's international

obligations and with the general purposes of the Industry

Act.

I suggest, therefore, that we are now in the position

where the only further action we can take which could

still save some thing for British firms even if the

Hong Kong Government decide to keep neither the Anglo-

Italian nor the Anglo-German-french groups in the

competition would be a concerted effort with the Hong

Kong and Japanese Governments aimed at securing UK

participation in the Japanese group who would then be

the sole negotiating partner with the Hong Kong Government

To pave the way for this I suggest that you should now

send a message to the Governor of Hong Kong in the terms

2

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.