terms.
Generally, I agree with the uservations expressed in the two preceday minted on the Gwenn's
to Britain.
Hag Kag
the broad argument
Is news
of the up-race if
There is sometting
I
"presence" in the Far East Pacific region,
vallen than impericalist
I the h
1
this antramed
chrons
the political value
of
even in modern
"But there are
the
an
ex
tet t
valter overstated
९
zur "presence" may give
in i
Antations
which we can ex
advantage - and Jagree that the trade arguments one
the
exploit this
Gwenor. As for China, while
райде prestige so lag
}
the Clurese
(0
nevitable
Some
are prepared to live will us over they Kay,
that
in practice arising from
is mine
سد
aything special
>
A gems
n our relations with China
Ки
on being the admishing power in they King
awkward rather than helpful. bhely to prve
2. Tague with in Joude that the despute should be cipued
65 No 10, Tuary, DEI, & MOD: I that it should be printed
-
When Wation
4/12
متنا
about
General
Anti
British fectin
amonit
bury
To many expatriates Coupled with tend
Britani (userlined
низкия
to
in Hongkong. Coupled
науком
outside
Kenan Tramik foray) thin
The Colony
Whitehall I
the nee
سا معنا انا احب
will
пашия вита
Parliament
H.R. 6/12
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.