CONFIDENTIAL
which might be questioned if we discriminate against Hong Kong.
The Hong Kong Government also argue that such discrimination would
divert trade away from Hong Kong and that this has already begun.
They fear that the US, Canada and Japan will use this as a precedent
for discriminating against Hong Kong, not only in textiles and
such footwear, but in other exports as well as electronics. They further
maintain that the Community's scheme for textiles has changed since
1971: the number of beneficiaries, some of whom are major
competitors of Hong Kong, has increased and the size of duty-free
quotas open to them is greater.
details are at annex B. Furthermore we shall begin phasing out
Commonwealth preference for Hong Kong from 1 "anuary 1974, which
will decrease her competitiveness vis à vis non-Commonwealth
suppliers.
There is some truth in this: full
6. At his meetings with Mr Royle and the Secretary of State during
September, the Governor again stressed the political importance of
this question to Hong Kong. He pointed out that a dependent
territory was in a different constitutional and moral position even
from independent members of the Commonwealth.
He concluded that we
To do so and fail
must be seen to defend Hong Kong's interests.
would be something; not to put the case at all would he considered,
be unacceptable.
*
7. The Hong Kong side of the Office accordingly consider that the
question should be re-opened.
CONFIDENTIAL
THE EUROPEAN CASE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.