TNAG-0353-FCO40-389-Reform-of-local-government-in-Hong-Kong-1972 — Page 105

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

5

Wednesday, February 9, 1972

The functions as set out in the White Paper were largely

acceptable to the Urban Councillors themselves provided that the resettlement

and housing functions which were at present within the sphere of the Urban

Council and the Housing Authority in its present guise were not removed

from them.

A second provision was that acceptable detailed arrangements

could be made in relation to finance and staff.

On the White Paper's proposal that the Urban Council's Standing

Orders should be subject to approval by the Legislative Council, Mr. Woo

said "this proposal is repugnant to all shades of opinion in the Urban.

Council".

The Urban Councillors felt that it was entirely inappropriate

that their internal rules of procedure should be subject to the approval

of the Legislature.

"The Unofficial Members of this Council agree that there is no

need to do so, subject to two provisos," Mr. Woo said.

The first proviso was that any essential controls should be

incorporated into the Ordinance itself, specifically, a provision should be

included to forbid ultra vires questions and debates, he added.

The second was to reserve the right of the Legislative Council to

enact special legislation in the event of any failure by the Urban Council

properly to provide for or observe regulations for its own proceedings, he

stressed.

Quoting from the White Paper, Mr. Woo said: "It must be recognised

that even to put the present proposals into full effect will involve the

resolution of many complex points of detail and difficult adjustments.

/ "During

Page 105Page 106

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.