TNAG-0348-FCO40-384-Costs-of-extra-services-provided-by-armed-forces-of-UK-in-Ho-1972 — Page 77

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

(118281) Dd. 391599 1,500M 2/69 Hw.

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry

No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted.

thclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

.In Confidence

GNFIDENTIAL

DRAFT

letter

To:-

L H Curzon Esq CB

Type 1 +

From

Mr Wilford

Telephone No. & Ext.

AUS(CF)

Ministry of Defence Main Building

Department

1.

Thank you very much for your letter of

and will let

let you

know also about

prostothe artstration

by the Themary.

Mi

I

24 February (AUS (CF)/7576) about the Snake Fence.

am very interested to read that you were advised by

the Command Secretary in Hong Kong that the Hong Kong

Government were under the impression that the FCO were

going to meet the cost of the Fence. I wonder if you

would be kind enough to let us have a copy of the

Command Secretary's report. It would be particularly

interesting to know who in the Hong Kong Government

gave him this impression.

If the Command Secretary's

communication was in 1967 I presume it referred to the

Commonwealth Office rather than to the FCO,

but this will no doubt emerge if you can send us a

copy of the communication.

2.

Lin the meantimes

We are looking urgently into the matter in the

light of your letter

but I would just make two points:

But

(a) It is true that illegal immigration Car be

held to apply to anyone who crosses

an international barrier but doubt if the

influx of refugees from Bangladesh into

West Bengal was called illegal immigration by

anybody and that was precisely the situation

with which we might have had to deal in

Hong Kong.

(b) I accept that Hall, in his letter of 4

October 1967 expressed views on

SECRET

behalf

/of

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.