TNAG-0348-FCO40-384-Costs-of-extra-services-provided-by-armed-forces-of-UK-in-Ho-1972 — Page 57

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

(118281) Dd. 391599 1,500M 2/69 Hw,

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry

No. HKK 10/9

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted.

SECRET

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

DRAFT

LETTER

To:-

A F Thorp Esq OBE Head of Fl(Air)

CONFIDENTIAL viring SECRET

Ministry of Defence Main Building Whitehall SW 1

Type 1 +

From

Mr Wilford

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

10

D

In Confidence

THE BUILDING OF THE SNAKE FENCE IN HONG KONG

Thank you for your letter of 3 March.

grateful for the clarification of the phrase

I am

in Curzon's earlier letter, but paragraph 4 of your

letter recording the FCO view of 1969 seems to make

Curzon's remark academic.

2.

Before commenting on Curzon's proposal for

arbitration I must revert to the body of his letter

which misinterprets completely the substance of the

Governor of Hong Kong's telegram No. 1320 by

quoting only from its penultimate paragraph where a

subsidiary advantage of the building of the fence was

mentioned that is its contingent use against

refugees.

I cannot do better in seeking to

сбо

describe the conditions of 1967 than to let you read

for yourself ch 8 of the Hong Kong Government's

confidential report on the disturbances. This,

I attach. It nowhere describes the building of the

Snake fence, but it gives a graphic description of

the situation which faced the military and the police

on the border with China. After reading it I doubt

if the Ministry of Defence will wish to describe what

the troops were dealing with as "illegal immigration".

3. Secondly I must ask you to look again at my

letter of 14 February in which I too dealt with the

/exchange

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.