CONFIDENTIAL
3. On the substance of the matter, I myself cannot see any
difficulty over the point made in paragraph 2 of Hong Kong
telegram No 72 (when I discussed this briefly with Mr Ridley
on the telephone earlier this week he more or less agreed
that we could give this assurance). Paragraph 3 of the
telegram (up swing from Group II or Group III to Group IV)
is clearly more difficult, but I would have thought we might
try for a compromise between 4.6 million square yards and
10 million square yards. I suspect that the point in
paragraph 4 will be the most difficult of all for the DTI
to accept.
4. In pressing the DTI to consider moving a little further
towards the Hong Kong position Mr Royle would, I think,
have to base his case quite simply on the fact that Hong Kong
is a Crown Colony.
5.
Mr Royle may wish to write to Sir John Eden on the
lines of the attached draft.
agreed with Mr Hale.
Its terms have been broadly
Eɣana
E O Laird
Hong Kong Department
26 January 1972
tre must make
the fullest possible
cc
Mr Bottomley
Mr Keeble
Mr Hale
use of the Soft's visit KHK
ат
and the need
urrecked.
2.
亅
CONFIDENTIAL
agree
for
this not
with the Draft.
tum Wilford 267
(885363) Dd. 896639 1,000M 8/71 St.S.
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.