RESTRICT ED
procedural position there should be fewer difficulties
although it would be well to check there would be no
complications.
In
10. In discussion, various views were expressed in
regard to Mr Haddon-Cave's questions. It was generally
felt that Article XXIV 1 did preclude a GATT relation-
ship between Hong Kong and the UK, and that the pro-
vision in Article XXVI 5(c) was intended to apply to
dependent territories with a large measure of internal
self-government and/or approaching full independence,
(neither of which was applicable to Hong Kong). The
point was raised whether the provisions in Article
XXVI 1 could be amended in present circumstances.
this connection the Chairman referred to an earlier
opinion of the FCO Legal Adviser in which the latter
gave his view that although it would be legally possi-
ble, he found it very difficult to reconcile autonomy
in external commercial affairs with the constitutional
position. Mr Haddon-Cave agreed with this view. He
also expressed reserve about external commercial auto-
nomy for Hong Kong in regard to the reaction of China,
although he thought the Chinese less sensitive now in
this regard than they had been a few years ago.
11.
The meeting concluded that the juridical position
and the interpretation of the GATT was one on which a
legal view was essential. Miss Elliott undertook to
put this question to Mr Laird in writing so that the
FCO Legal Adviser would be able to comment.
Practical Implications
12.
It was recognised that the Legal Adviser's advice
/in regard
4
RESTRICTED
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.