NOTHING TO BE Written in THIS MARGIN
RESTRICTED
but did have GATT relationship (through the UK) with
the 6 members of the EEC and the 3 other applicant
countries.
4.
The EEC was not a member as a single entity.
The de facto situation was somewhat different in
the CTC where the UK signed both on its own behalf and
separately for Hong Kong; this arose from the
recognition of the different interests in this Committee
of the UK as an importer and Hong Kong as an exporter.
Physically, Hong Kong's delegate sat separately from
the UK team. The EEC as a whole was a signatory of
the LTA, and so were its individual member states.
5. Difficulties might arise for Hong Kong in these
two bodies following Britain's adherence to the Treaty
of Rome and subsequent alignment of policy among the
10 members. The problem as seen from Hong Kong fell
into two parts. First, how would the UK accession
affect Hong Kong's legal position under the GATT
vis-a-vis the other 9 EEC members, whilst the latter
remained contracting parties? It was accepted that
a different situation would arise if the member states
of the EEC gave up individual membership of the GATT and the enlarged community itself became a contracting
party, but that this was a long-term and possibly
hypothetical problem. Secondly, how Hong Kong in
practice could invoke its GATT relationship with the 9
through the UK who, as a member of the enlarged EEC,
must follow the general EEC line in any given case?
6. Mr Haddon-Cave said Hong Kong would prefer to
retain their non-GATT relationship with the UK but did
not want this non-GATT relationship extended to the EEC.
2.
RESTRICTED
/He said
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.