11.
SECRET
a safeguard against possible cuts in their
capital works programme) because this.
would virtually mean giving the military
authorities a blank cheque.
The entire
proposals are based on the estimates of
capital costs provided by the Ministry of
provided
Defence (see Appendix to attached Annex)
Λ
and they must therefore stand by those
estimates.
The Treasury and the Ministry of Defence are
very reluctant to support the Governor's proposals.
Their main arguments are:
(a) A contribution of £7.5 million per annum
would be less, in terms of the proportion
that it would represent of the total
estimated annual costs of the garrison
(£26.4 million) than was the previous
contribution negotiated in 1966
(£5 million against total annual costs of
£16 million).
(16) Hong Kong could well afford to pay a
contribution of £8.5 million per annum
(and over a period of seven instead of
$
five years an even higher figure might
reasonably be expected). It benefits
appreciably, both economically and in
terms of public confidence, from the
presence of the garrison and there seems
no reason why the United Kingdom tax
payer should be expected to subsidise the
people of Hong Kong whose rate of
taxation is much lower than that in this
country.
6 SECRET
/12.
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.