CONFIDENTIAL
Грил
placing
we would avoid a breach of our international undertakings
because we would not act except where and when the market
showed we had a case for doing so (and we should in the
meantime have warned our trading partners of our intention
and of the probability that there would be no time to go
through the consultation procedures of the Long Term Arrangement). By this means we might hope to deter imports from rising. But if the deterrent did not work (and it
might casily prompt traders to take their chance while they could), we could contain imports to an acceptable level for the whole of 1972 only by a cut-back, perhaps severe, for the remainder of the year, which could dislocate supplies (including those to many British textile mills). And
traders would have had to suffer the worst kind of stop-go
interference.
་
9 Both the remuing options would contuin importe from
the beginning of 1972 and would involve inmediate breach of
international obligations and understandings. The third
option would be to impose a global quota on all currently
restricted supplier countries at a level equivolont to the
total of the present restrictions. It would allow importers to buy where they liked, within broad category ceilings.
would benefit the most competitive suppliers and continue to
discourage the least competitive forms of production in
Lancashire. Compared with the present quotas, it would
favour countries like Pakistan, Singapore and Halaysia, and
also Korea and Taiwan, who have been held down by the
It
6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.