22
CONFIDENTIAL
た
3.
9.
10.
11.
12.
a technologically different situation, where all textiles
should be dealt with on a comprehensive basis. All this
demanded the positive approach of tariff protection, rather than the negative approach of quotas."
"Any attempt to go back to a quota control system would be a retrograde step and would have international and
domestic repercussions."
Further Consultations with Indian Officials at DTI, 5 May 1971
DTI officials: "In the particular case of yarn, the UK spinners were already complaining that a duty of 61% was
not sufficiently high, but HMG wanted the industry to
learn to live behind a tariff of this order. In some
measure, the operation of the tariff would itself reveal
sectors which the UK industry did not find profitable and
where demand would therefore be filled by overseas suppliers."
"The progressive introduction of the tariff with quotas
remaining in force was completely at variance with HMG's
intentions in moving to the tariff. They did not wish to give the UK industry the dual protection of both the tariff and the quota; the aim was to induce UK industry to live
with the tariff alone. Once they became accustomed to both
the tariff and the quotas, it would be extremely difficult
to remove the quotas."
Consultations with Indian Officials at DTI, 6 May 1971
Sir Max Brown: "The UK objective was to provide a market
for cotton textiles in the UK on classical competitive
lines, using a limited tariff for protection of the domestic
industry."
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.