NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
CONFIDENTI AL
No Change
16.
Paragraph 25 of the DTI draft submission sets out
in more detail the argument for this option. In
deciding on the tariff policy, it was always envisaged
that imports would remain at a relatively high level;
and that following liberalisation, in the short term,
they would rise. This was to be one of the key elements
to provide the pressure to get rid of the less viable
firms. While there is some evidence to show that
imports may respond more quickly to demand than
domestic production, we believe that the latter should
revive by mid-72. Although overseas suppliers have
clearly controlled prices better in the past than UK
producers (a relative difference of 20% from 1968 to
1970), there is some sign that price increases since
December 1970 have been at about the same level for
hoth foreign and British textile suppliers.
Tariffs and quotas
17.
This system involves invoking LTA in conditions of
market disruption. The levels of restraint would be
those of the 12 months of the 15 month period preceding
the decision to seek restrictions. Such a system would would
hold down potentially sizable suppliers like Korea and
Taiwan; it would however mean a row with at least some
Commonwealth countries and some very difficult and
hurried negotiations to extend our bilateral agreements
with Hong Kong and India, both of whom strongly
resented the proposed tariff policy. Our main defence (statements to Hong Kong are at Annex ; to India at Annex ) of the move to tariffs from quotas was that
the latter froze trade in traditional patterns. We
CONFIDENTIAL
/have
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.