levels in Lancashire (as elsewhere) are unusually high, and
redundant textile workers are finding it difficult to obtain
other employment.
which may
Secondly, Ministers have now decided that the UK should not seek a
derogation from the obligation to fall into line, from the
date of our entry into the Common Market, with the Community's
cotton textile restraint arrangements with the major low cost
suppliers. This means that, in the course of 1972, the
Commission will renegotiate its existing agreements with seven
. countries to include quotas for the UK and the other three
EEC applicants. Once this becomes generally known
happen at any time, now that we have made our position clear
in Brussels there is a serious risk that UK importers and
exporting countries alike, realising that there will be only
one year of liberalisation between the ending of the present
UK quota scheme, and our adoption of the possibly more
restrictive EEC arrangements on 1 January, 1973, will build
up vast stocks of imported cotton textiles in the UK in the
course of 1972, to forestall the new controls.
Thirdly reliable informants in the importing trade tell us that the more
responsible importers themselves are becoming alarmed at the
size of the forward contracts they have entered into for 1972,
not only with established suppliers like Hong Kong and others
like Taiwan and S Korea, which had been particularly
unfavourably placed under the quota controls, but also from
a string of new Asiatic suppliers (Thailand, Indonesia etc).
With so many suppliers competing for business, the prices which are being quoted are said to be exceptionally low.
8
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.