official level on 28 May. This decision goes com-
pletely contrary to the message from the Prime Minister
delivered to Mr Sato on 27 May, and of which some of
the participants must have been aware. The Foreign
Ministry have told us that it is unlikely that we shall
get a formal reply to the PM's message before the
officials! recommendation comes before
Cabinet on 20 June. The talks with Mr
fore the last effective opportunity to
the Japanese and his officials Aichi faře there-
apply pressure
further
to the Japanese to extend a worthwhile GPS offer to
Hong Kong ab initio. HM Ambassador at Tokyo urges tha
we perist in this attempt.
bro
desivable to bring home to
if the Seem
ary
It would therefore be helpf the Japanese side State Wove to express forcibly to 2 Aichi HMG's sur-
were
prise and concern that Japan, whose GPS is in any case
less generous in scope than that of the other major
donors, should, notwithstanding the PM's message and
Mr Sato's statement in the Diet, apparently still find
it too difficult to contemplate the inclusion from the
Hong Kay and ther U.K.
outset of Gemmenworth dependent territories as bene-
ficiaries. Among these, only Hong Kong has any siyniz
[Additional arguments for use in the official talks as appropriate Fient industrial experts, A deliberate discrimina- vion against Hong Kong would be especially regrettable
because:-
a. Japan exports four times more goods to Hong
Kong than she imports from Hong Kong.
b. The Japanese example is bound to influence the
decision of other donors, notably the Americans",
against Hong Kong. Inevitably it will appear
that Japan's action has been motivated by a
desire to injure a competitor in the US market.
2
CONFIDENTIAL
in si 152 Japan pint
i just fication of the decisa. I
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.