THE US TRADE SURPLUS, HAVE BROUGHT RENEWED PRESSURES TO REVERSE
LIBERALISATION. HENCE THE TRADE BILL PASSED BY THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE LAST CONGRESS, WHICH WOULD HAVE WEAKENED
THE FIGHT AGAINST INFLATION AND LAID US EXPORTS OPEN TO
RETALIATION. ALTHOUGH THE BILL DID NOT BECOME LAW, THE PRESSURES
REMAIN STRONG, AND IF THE GAINS FREE TRADE HAS PRODUCED FOR
THE ECONOMY ARE TO BE SUSTAINED 'IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE WIDER
PUBLIC INTEREST BE VOICED AS STRONGLY AS THE COMPLAINTS OF
ADVERSELY AFFECTED PARTIES
DOMESTIC ADJUSTMENTS
3. THE REPORT SAYS THAT THE ADVOCATES OF FREE TRADE TOO OFTEN
IGNORE THE BURDENS OF THOSE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY IT.
IMPORT RESTRICTIONS, HOWEVER, ARE NOT THE BEST SOLUTION. A
BETTER APPROACH, THE REPORT SUGGESTS IN SEVERAL PLACES, IS THAT OF
ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE. OF COURSE THE COSTS OF THIS HAVE TO BE
PAID FOR BY THE TAX-PAYER, BUT THESE EVENTUALLY DECREASE
WHEREAS QUOTAS IMPOSE CONTINUING COSTS ON THE CONSUMER AND
EXPOSE EXPORT INDUSTRIES CIN WHICH WAGES ARE USUALLY HIGHER THAN
IN IMPORT-COMPETING INDUSTRIES) TO THE RISK THAT OTHER
COUNTRIES MAY IMPORT LESS FROM THE US. VOLUNTARY RESTRAINTS
JUSTIFIA
MAY OCCASIONALLY BE JUSTIFIABLE, BUT TARIFFS ARE PREFERABLE
TO QUOTAS AND PRELIMINARY EFFORTS IN GATT TOWARDS THE REDUCTION OF
NON-TARIFF BARRIERS SHOULD BE INTENSIFIED IN 1971.
IMPORT RESTRICTIONS AND DOMESTIC PRICES
4. THE REPORT STATES THAT FOR A COUNTRY TO BENEFIT FROM TRADE
LIBERALISATION IT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT ITS PARTNERS ALSO HAVE
LIBERAL POLICIES: HOWEVER, EXPERIENCE SHOWS THAT RECIPROCAL
ACTION IS MORE LIKELY THAN UNILATERAL TO BRING PROGRESS TOWARDS
FREE TRADE.
· /THE EEC ·
2
Page 150Page 151
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.