13.
It is the Board of Trade's view that in the absence of
improvements at Kai Tak:
(a) the scope for increased use of the airport by BOAC would
be seriously limited; they would, for example, be unable
to operate the Boeing 747 through Hong Kong and there
would undoubtedly be a heavy loss in airline revenue;
(b) Kai Tak would become progressively of less value in air
services negotiations with, as a result, less "indirect
benefit" to British airlines;
(၁)
(a)
increase in airport revenue would be cut back;
the United Kingdom would be open to criticism inter-
nationally for failure to maintain the airport to the
standard which might reasonably be expected, by ICAO and
by the countries which have acquired traffic rights at
Hong Kong.
Hong Kong's Interest
14.
Undoubtedly Hong Kong will itself derive benefit from the
projected development. Some of the improvements (e.g. to apron
parking area, terminal building, cargo facilities) are in any case
necessary to meet the growing traffic provided by existing services.
The extended services to be provided by the new generation of aircraft
(for which runway lengthening is considered necessary) must lead to
increased tourist traffic: at present some half million tourists
annually spend an estimated £15-20 million in Hong Kong; and there
must be general and less tangible advantages to the economy in
improved facilities for business and trade contacts with other
countries.
-6-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.