entangled quest in
control
at
question of landing rights at H.K,
great profile A Bata L.K. interests
should fir the mmey. This, they can't, they
what the B...T.
Har the B...T.
could not do. In
in
the matter
matter, but
fact the feo
the only
real
advocate for HK.
hre
could
not prevail though
a
final negative
given
that if the fias
KH.K. When the Tate Sof
།ཁ་བ་ལི་
= tk
i
his gast
situatio
- 1971 justified
answer
TE UMELCO
لعيف
/ April he said
prepued
creme
to Took
the matter again.
The H.K. Jork's argement for seating
approed to financing the whole
werk
from
HM G
themselve
is benerd
the
very
considerable capital expenditure
capital expenditure what they
committed
~
the
are a healy
next
fow yours
when the mamay for Kaitak
wwww
مملة
be required.
It is true Hat the It.. gost
is
rice
af comall
Эливер
крадне
the whole
whole cost-
cos-of- Kantale
Анк
НК до
I about
almoor wholly
assistance
from WK,
NK
find the für
money from its
it coene
(the
exter scin
the cost of which has icrecoct from
150 m). The arguments
= farrows of stage helping
political: (g) HK
като наб
Viv
irtually no
prot wor
rehabilitatin
bootstraps;
has pulled herself of laghe
(b) HMG have dealt the H.K. Int
диоко
some très
mady
brows -kantile
several
of air traffic nights
remmigration and, especially reaunted - the Kaitak Contoret, which haure
devaluation
атал
very
سقط
Disadvantageous KHK's ( airline (CPA);
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.