TNAG-0271-FCO40-307-Legislation-on-immigration-and-deportation-in-Hong-Kong-1971 — Page 10

4° Clifton

Münte My 25 hou

Reference.

miss hitter to see para 5

We spoke about the Bill beamist ☺ and

Your minute of 11 November.

2. When we reply to acting why thong tang

want's this Bill

I think

we shall have to draw attention to the specific clauses about

whees

42

have doubts. You have said that

вам

J.

the Bill would afford the Farines wider powers

than are at present enjoyed by the

in the UVT.

Perhaps apow

Home Secretions

which

would, was

this.

I right

PITO.

clauses you

have in wind when saying

3. As regarns x1 of your menite,

in thinking that O.K. legislation does not

make Brush Subject beconging to Hang Tang

subject to the same resuèctions

And that

it is not

Can

4.

you

дау

likely

aliens?

مترحمة الله

to do so?

if the statement at 1x of para

of the despatch of Sept. 1934 (Flag 17) still

holds good

?

3

5. As regards this Miller's minute of 244/xi/20

Can you say

what action is being taken on

the requests for similar powers which have

been received from

other dependent

15.12