M* Carter.
Reference........
will
Mr Carter.
Please
32
0.
2.
It has taken Hong Kong nearly, twos
ها
years
to replay
قا.
.15 (8) on HwWB. 18/65 and nine months
to reply
to (
on
HKK. 18/21.
The
question arises
Whether
the
State may
because of
any replies should be sent to the Chairman of
Heung Ye Kuk at all after.
balanc
time; but
this capse of time;
I think that replies should be sent,
particularly, in view of
ģ
also
the possibility, that the Sec. Cat's this year, be visiting Hong Kong
the undertaking referred
to in paral
28
HWB3.18/65
13. The drafts
enclosed, with .
this file are, I
4.
think adequate in substance, but they leave one
in some doubt whether it in the Hong Kong
What is replying on its own
q
The Sery of
State.
(4.
Groov.
behay or on behalf
was in fact the Sec. of
State for Commonwealth Affairs who was concerned
worth the minivandum presented by the Hering
Kutz
Jee Kuke delegation in 1968)
снаја I have been through the drafts be hiivi (1) and chave indicated anc
Amendment
clear that it is the Hong Kong
to make it
Groot, whein is
replying
Wesholde and I have
Amincied
as agreed
ANG
the drafts
23.1.70.
Authoriad
to do so.
it's own behalf,
after having.
سسنا
/рабрите
to reply
to © by
a sd.
5. If you a foce,
returning. The drafts melości with @, with any
necesswy
andments shown on
and
(Tom)
cithing Hong Kong to issue the replies as
,
provided that they see mo
HING
22.170.
agictio
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.