CONFIDENTIAL
to reach any firm conclusion as to the relative
validity of the arguments at (a) and (b) above.
5. If further consultations, in the light of
experience during the period 1967-1970, were to
convince the two parties that RTV's ideas had
something in them for both sides and if, as a
result, TVB agreed not to press for the legis-
lation aimed at RTV, it seems to me that in
return RTV might well be ready to concede the
case on aerials. This would make it possible
for TVB (or anyone else duly licensed for the
purpose) to erect and use ADS aerials as and
when necessary. Would you agree that it was
worthwhile to try and cut the Gordian knot by
getting the two sides together, perhaps under
Government chairmanship?
agreement and hence to there being no need to
include in your local legislation the conten-
tious clauses at present envisaged; and if in
consequence
then
If this led to
Barliamentary obstruction here was
unlikely this would be an excellent outcome:
Agreement between the parties would clear the
way for the full introduction of the Order in
Council and consequently for the extension of
the UK Copyright Act of 1956 to Hong Kong, for
which the Board of Trade, and others and not
least yourselves, have long been pressing.
6. In any event I think we are all agreed on
the pressing need to bring Hong Kong's copy-
right law up to date by the extension to the
Colony of the 1956 Act. Unless, therefore,
you feel confident that a satisfactory compro-
mise can be reached without undue delay, as
between RTV and TVB, we should like to revert
to our earlier suggestion (paragraph 7 of
Commonwealth Office Saving Despatch No. 479 of
CONFIDENTIAL
/5 August...
76
She
HWB. 16/6 Part B.
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.