TNAG-0261-FCO40-297-Applications-by-judges-for-admission-to-legal-practise-at-Ho-1970 — Page 45

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

LORD

CHANCELLOR

k

HOUSE OF LORDS,

S.W.1

26th February 1970

4/8

Dan ft Petrie,

I enclose a letter which the Lord Chancellor has received from M. H. Jackson-Lipkin, who, as you may know, is a member of the Hong Kong Bar as well as being a

member of our Bar. Lord Gardiner, who has received letters from him before

now.

Jackson-Lipkin is known to

I don't think that we ought to reply on behalf of the Lord Chancellor; but we thought that you might be prepared to give him our answer, perhaps through the Attorney General in Hong Kong. Our answers are as follows:

(

RECEIVED IN REGISTRY No. 51

.9/0

MICK 14/15

(a) The distinction between a High Court Judge in

England (who does not retain his appointment as Queen's Counsel) and a county court judge (who does retain the appointment), is based on the method of appointment. Appointment as Queen's Counsel is by Letters Patent and so is appoint- ment to the High Court Bench. At common law an inferior office conferred by patent merges in a superior office so conferred and is extinguished thereby. An appointment as Q.C. therefore merges in appointment as a High Court Judge. A county court judge, however, is

Sir James McPetrie, K.C.M.G., O.B.E., Foreign and Commonwealth office.

/appointed

Page 45Page 46

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.