Reference.......
HKK.14/19.
relating to the judiciary. When we have their views we can then decide whether, and if so in what terms, to raise the matter
with the Governor, for there is no indication of his views in the
Chief Justice's letter.
5. It is conceivable that the District Judges would claim that
it was unfair to ask them to give an undertaking not to
practise after retirement having regard to the fact that their retiring age is 55, as opposed to 62 for a Judge of the Supreme Court, and this is a matter on which the Governor may have views.
But the argument that an undertaking not to practise may cause hardship to certain individuals could not, I think, be allowed to prevail if it was regarded as objectionable in principle that
retired District Judges should practise in the courts. The way to
avoid such hardship while observing the principle would be to
raise the retiring age of District Judges, though admittedly
such a step would initially at any rate cause consternation among the Magistrates who are waiting for promotion to the
District Court. All the best District Judges, of course, achieve
promotion to the Supreme Court before they reach the age of 55
and of the remainder Mr. Williams, as I have said, is the first
to have expressed a wish to practise in Hong Kong on his
retirement. It may be, therefore, that the expatriate District
Judges would not be worried by an undertaking not to practise,
though, with the present retiring age, it might be different
in the case of a local man who would be expecting to remain in
Hong Kong after retirement. There are at present two local
Judges in the District Court who are, I think, the first to
have been appointed.
In his letter the Chief Justice also makes a suggestion
for dealing with existing District Court Judges, who were not
6.
1
of course required to give any undertaking at the time when they were appointed. These Judges will already be aware, as a result
of Mr. Williams case, that the Government is disposed to oppose
an application by a retired District Judge to be admitted to practise. In general I agree with the line which the Chief
Justice suggests he might take with existing District Judges, though I shall have a rather less abrupt form of words to
propose when we write to the Governor.
JCM?
(J.C. McPetrie)
21 April, 1970
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.