TNAG-0260-FCO40-296-Legislation-for-prevention-of-bribery-in-Hong-Kong-1970 — Page 205

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No.

DEPARTMENT

HKK 14/8.

SÉCURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secre

nfidential

westricted; Unclassified

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

En Clair, Code Cypher

Draft Telegram to:--

Governor,Hong Kong

No.

(Date)

And to:-

PRIORITY MARKINGS

(Date)

Flash

immedia Priority Bautina

• Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should reach addressce(s).

Despatched

[Security_if any

Security classification"

[ Privacy marking

-if any

[Codeword-if any]

Addressed to

telegram .................

1

CONFIDENTIAL

GOVERNOR HONG KONG

(date)

And to

repeated for information to

140 amp bag am LNE SVIDN

Saving to..

Your telegram No

543

Repeat to:-

ao yao yakita

Saving to:-

Distribution:---

Files

Copies to:-

HKD

Sir L.

Monson

3ir James

McFetrie

Mr.Rushford

Miss Deas (with why F.ED.

Frevention of Bribery Bill

There appears to be considerable misunderstanding

over this matter.

Since Roberts raised the subject

of the Bill with McPetric, the latter naturally mentioned objections which he as a lawyer saw to the

retention of Clause 10.

He certainly did not express

4

the view that Ministers would not approve the Clause

hacerswry, Mmisters thought it done to refer the although he did say that if the mattop-worq puturënd

latter

Bill

to the Law Officers he thought would share his

Lto

doubto. Nor did he say or imply that you "would

get no answer this year"

2.

At no stage has it been suggested or expected that you should defer to informal opinions from our

Legal Advisers. The question whether Clause 10

/2...

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.