TNAG-0258-FCO40-294-Legislation-relating-to-criminal-procedure-in-Hong-Kong-1971 — Page 103

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

W(B)L 51-7406

CONFIDENTIAL

that all courts should have the sweeping powers

conferred by Sections 122 and 123 is there-

fore understandable.

It is because of the

special circumstances obtaining in the Colony that efforts have been made to meet

the Governor's wishes as far as can be

justified. The two sections are very

similar in their effect and if Section 122

were left in its present form, as desired

by the Governor, it would mean that any

court, when hearing any criminal case except

cases in which the court sought to ensure

the safety or well-being of a witness or any

other person (in which case only Section 123

would apply), could exclude the general

public (although not the press) from the

whole of the proceedings, including the

announcement of sentence, on the grounds that

the interests of justice or of public order

or security so required. Such a power seems

unnecessary and difficult to justify, even in

the particular circumstances of Hong Kong,

and in the view of Legal Advisers, and of the

Department, the amendments mentioned in

paragraph 5 (a) and (b) above are the mini-

mum to which we could agree. Moreover,

it was our impression that agreement on these

amendments had, in fact, been reached in our

discussions with the Attorney General,

Hong Kong, last August.

10

I Take in

Auit wo pages back]

Dartwo

11. As regards the Governor's request that

amendmente to the Ordinance be deferred

for the time being (see paragraph 8 above),

More than a year has already alapsed since

- 6 -

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.