TNAG-0249-FCO40-285-Effect-of-entry-of-UK-into-EEC-on-exports-from-Hong-Kong-1970 — Page 89

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

A

N

STERLING BALANCES

25.

"Either as a form of retaliation, or to replace loss of foreign exchange

earnings from exports, Hong Kong might consider reducing her sterling balances.

Under the Sterling Agreement, which was signed with Hong Kong in September 1968,

the United Kingdom provides a US dollar value guarantee of the bulk of Hong

Kong's sterling balances in return for an undertaking by Hong Kong to maintain

a minimum proportion of her reserves in sterling throughout the life of the

Agreement. The proportion, which was established in bilateral negotiation with

Hong Kong, is high and obliges Hong Kong to keep almost all of her total

external reserves (about £400 million at end-May 1970) in sterling. The Agree-

ment with Hong Kong lasts for 5 years until September 1973. In common with

the agreements with other Sterling Area countries, most of which are of only

3 years' duration, it is due for review between March and September 1971.

26. Hong Kong could use the occasion of this review to press for a lower

minimum sterling proportion if she felt that United Kingdom entry into the EEC

11

would reduce her trade with the United Kingdom, on the grounds that in these

circumstances she would need larger dollar balances. It is quite possible that

she will press for some reduction even apart from the EEC point. In 1968 the

Colony felt that the minimum sterling proportion proposed by the United Kingdom

was too high, but she accepted it. Since 1968 Hong Kong's reserves have more

than doubled, and almost all that increase has been held in sterling, because

of the operation of the agreement. The United Kingdom's attitude to a request

of this sort would depend upon its timing, upon what was being done vis-a-vis

other OSA countries, and on the precise proportion to which Hong Kong sought

to drop. We should probably accept that a major change in trading patterns

was reasonable grounds for a reduction in the minimum sterling proportion, but

in 1971 the precise nature of such changes in respect of Hong Kong would not in

be clear and we should be unlikely to want to make such a concession then.

27

The Colony's reaction to such a refusal might be lively. However, with

a 5 year Agreement Hong Kong could not make a lower sterling proportion a

condition of continuing the Agreement and is thus prevented from using the size

12

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.