by specific limits results in the setting up of category by
category ceilings and, in this regard, the proposal does not
substantially differ from proposals calling for comprehensive
restrictions.
This point is greatly to be regretted, inasmuch as the
Government of Japan has consistently taken the position that
comprehensive restrictions are wholly unacceptable.
(2): The proposal represents some improvement over the
December proposal in that specific limits were somewhat increased.
Yet, total export limits for 1970 under the proposal amount to
less than the actual level of exports in 1969. This is contrary
to the views expressed by the United States representatives on
frequent occasions, including those expressed by Secretary of
Commerce Stans on the occasion of his visit to Japan last year,
to the effect that the Government of the United States does not
seek to roll back the level of past exports
(3) The proposal calls for an agreement effective for a
long and fixed term of 5 years. This is in conflict with the
Japanese position that export restraints should be considered
as provisional measures undertaken for the sake of expediency
until such time as the United States Government Ma
to resort to Article 19 of the GATT.
in a position
The basic views of the Government of Japan concerning ways.
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.