-2-
WOULD LEAVE THEM WITHOUT REMEDY AGAINST THE EMERGENCE OF
DAMAGING IMPORTS IN OTHER TEXTILE CATEGORIES. I BELIEVE IT
WOULD BE REALISTIC, THEREFORE, TO HOLD OUT THE PROSPECT OF EVOLVING A SYSTEM WHICH MET THE TWO ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES,
NAMELY:
(A) GAVE IMPORTING COUNTRIES TIMELY SAFEGUARDS AGAINST THE
THJEAT OF DISRUPTIVE IMPORTS IN SPECIFIC CATEGORIES:
AND
(B)
OFFERED EXPORTERS PROTECTION AGAINST ARBITRARY ACTION
UPON THE UNILATERAL JUDGEMENT OF AN IMPORTING COUNTRY.
I RECOGNISE THAT THIS IS WHAT ARTICLE XIX OF GATT ALREADY AIMS B1!
TO PROVIDE AND THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY IT MIGHT NOT BE
POSSIBLE TO DEVISE PROCEDURES SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM
THESE. AS THE AMERICANS HAVE REPEATEDLY REJECTED THE IDEA
OF RECOURSE TO ARTICLE XIX, HOWEVER, IT IS NECESSARY TO GIVE
AT LEAST THE APPEARANCE OF COMING UP WITH SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
F.C.0. PASS ROUTINE UKMIS GENEVA, HONG KONG AND TOKYO.
MR. FREEMAN.
would
agree wish This, & accen than something with than CAN XIX IS
жина
GRS
425
SENT AT 15147/23 FEB A.Ă.
-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.